Nut Butter Plant Has Salmonella Newport and Java Problem

The 36-year-old East Wind Community Inc., a commune in the Missouri Ozarks, has a Salmonella problem inside its nut butter manufacturing facility.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said its inspectors collected samples from inside the East Wind nut butter plant and its laboratory analysis discovered the presence of Salmonella.

East Wind manufactures Almond Butter, Peanut Butter, Organic Peanut Butter, Roasted Peanuts, Cashew Butter, Tahini and Organic Tahini. Tahini is seed butter made from sesame seeds. The commune has been making Nut Butters since the 1980s.

In Warning Letter sent to East Wind on Oct. 5, 2009, FDA said its considers products manufactured at the nut butter plant to be adulterated because they were "prepared, packed or held under insanitary conditions whereby [they] may have become contaminated with filth, or whereby [they] may have been rendered injurious to health."

FDA said samples were positive for Salmonella in seven different locations near both production lines. Serotypes S. Java was found in one sample, and S. Newport in the six others. FDA said five of the six S. Newport strains had identical Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns.

"This is significant because these five samples were located in five different locations in both production rooms indicating that S. Newport may have been transported throughout your production areas and established niche areas of colonize," FDA's Kansas City District Director John W. Thorsky said in the letter to the commune.

One of the six S. Newport serotypes was found near where caps are applied to seal open containers of the ready-to-eat product. "This close proximity increases the potential of contamination of the product with Salmonella," Thorsky added.

The FDA warning urges East Wind to take "prompt and aggressive actions to eliminate the Salmonella contamination addressed in this letter."

"Bacteria may enter and/or be transported through a food plant by a variety of routes that include, but are not limited to: roof leaks; the shoes of employees, contractors, and visitors; the wheels of fork lifts, pallet movers, and moveable equipment; soiled pallets; soiled raw material packaging; on raw ingredients, particularly peanuts, tree nuts, and cocoa beans; and rodent vectors," FDA advises.

"Once established on production area floors, the organism can contaminate food and food-contact surfaces either through human or mechanical means."

East Wind's Internet sales site makes no mention of the Salmonella problem at its plant, which is located on County Road 547 near Tecumseh, MO. The site does say its products were not involved with the Salmonella outbreak involving products made by Peanut Corporation of America, which resulted in 700 illnesses and nine deaths nationwide in late 2008 and early 2009.

Mother Jones Magazine carried a story on East Wind in 1984 by Kathy Bennett, a commune member.

"We've chosen," Bennett wrote, "to base our society on cooperation ... as an alternative to the material wastefulness, competitiveness, and isolation of the "outside" world. Thus, we hold our land, labor, and businesses in common.

"All income generated by our activities belongs to the community, and we decide as a group what projects we'll undertake, what goods we'll purchase, and how we'll divide them. Since we share the use of our vehicles and laundry and kitchen facilities, we need fewer of them to provide "enough."

The commune owns about 1,045 acres in the Missouri Ozarks near the Arkansas border.

With the exception of some daily chore assignments, commune members set their own work routines.

Multistate Outbreak of Salmonella Infections Associated With Small Turtle Exposure, 2007-2008

PEDIATRICS (doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0272)

Julie R. Harris, PhDa,b, David Bergmire-Sweat, MPHc, Julie H. Schlegel, MSPd, Kim A. Winpisinger, MSe, Rachel F. Klos, DVMf, Christopher Perry, BSa,g, Robert V. Tauxe, MDa and Mark J. Sotir, PhDa

Objective:  Turtle-associated salmonellosis was increasingly recognized in the United States during the 1960s, leading to a federal ban in 1975 on the sale of turtles <4 inches in carapace length (small turtles). Although sporadic reports of turtle-associated Salmonella are frequent, outbreaks are rare. In September 2007, several patients with Salmonella enterica serotype Paratyphi B var Java infections reported recent turtle exposure. We conducted an investigation to determine the source and extent of the infections.

Patients and Methods Patients with Salmonella Paratyphi B var Java infections with a specific pulsed-field gel electrophoresis pattern (outbreak strain) and illness onset between May 2007 and January 2008, were compared with healthy controls. Reptile exposure and awareness of a Salmonella-reptile link were assessed. Turtle size and purchase information were collected.

Results:  We identified 107 patients with outbreak-strain infections. The median patient age was 7 years; 33% were hospitalized. Forty-seven (60%) of 78 patients interviewed reported exposure to turtles during the week before illness; 41 (87%) were small turtles, and 16 (34%) were purchased in a retail pet store. In the case-control study, 72% of 25 patients reported turtle exposure during the week before illness compared with 4% of 45 controls (matched odds ratio [mOR]: 40.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.9–unbounded]). Seven (32%) of 22 patients versus 11 (28%) of 39 controls reported knowledge of a link between reptile exposure and Salmonella infection (mOR: 1.3 [95% CI: 0.4–4.6]).

Conclusions:  We observed a strong association between turtle exposure and Salmonella infections in this outbreak. Small turtles continue to be sold and pose a health risk, especially to children; many people remain unaware of the link between Salmonella infection and reptile contact.

aCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; bEpidemic Intelligence Service, Office of Workforce and Career Development, Atlanta, Georgia; cNorth Carolina Division of Public Health, Raleigh, North Carolina; dSouth Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Columbia, South Carolina; eOhio Department of Health, Columbus, Ohio; fBureau of Communicable Diseases, Wisconsin Division of Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin; and gChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia

Salmonella-tainted Cantaloupe Recalled

Raley's grocers is recalling 1,120 cartons of Del Monte cantaloupe sold in Northern California and Nevada after routine testing detected salmonella in some of the produce, according to the California Department of Public Health.

The cantaloupe was sold throughout the San Francisco Bay Area at Raley's and its subsidiaries, Nob Hill Foods and Food Source.

The cantaloupes were purchased between Oct. 5 and Friday, and consumers can exchange the recalled fruit for a full refund.

Salmonella is a bacterium that causes one of the most common enteric (intestinal) infections in the United States – Salmonellosis. In some states (e.g. Georgia, Maryland), salmonellosis is the most commonly reported cause of enteric disease, and overall it is the second most common bacterial foodborne illness reported (usually slightly less frequent than Campylobacter infection).

The reported incidence of Salmonella illnesses is about 14 cases per each 100,000 persons (MMWR Weekly, 2006), amounting to approximately 30,000 confirmed cases of salmonellosis yearly in the U.S. (CDC, 2005, October 13). In 2005, just over 36,000 cases were reported from public health laboratories across the nation, representing a 12 percent decrease compared with the previous decade, but a 1.5 percent increase over 2004 (CDC, 2007).

Salmonella Canola Banned From US

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration refused 13 shipments of Canadian canola meal that contained salmonella in August and September, all from plants owned by Bunge Ltd., the FDA's website showed.

Twelve shipments came from a Bunge plant in Nipawin, Sask. The other originated in Altona, Man.  The canola industry in Canada has said the FDA is cracking down on salmonella because of a series of illness outbreaks since 2006.

Warning in Michigan - Alfalfa Sprouts May Contain Salmonella

Michigan State health officials are warning people not to eat raw alfalfa sprouts, which have sickened individuals in Kent County and across the state.

The Michigan Department of Community Health and Department of Agriculture said 12 cases of Salmonella Typhimurium infections caused by eating raw alfalfa sprouts have been reported in Kent, Bay, Genesee, Macomb, Oakland, Washtenaw and Wayne Counties. One of the 12 cases was found in Kent County, said Health Department Spokesman James McCurtis Jr.

The 12 individuals became ill between Aug. 17 to Sept. 18, and two have been hospitalized.

"Eating raw sprouts is a known risk for exposure to Salmonella or E. coli bacteria," said Dr. Gregory Holzman, chief medical executive for state health department. "We want to educate people about this known risk in order for them to make informed decisions concerning their health."

Antibiotic Resistance in Salmonella

Salmonella is a leading cause of foodborne illness worldwide, with an estimated 1.4 million cases each year in the United States alone (1). Salmonella infections are typically due to consumption of food products of animal origin. Several lines of evidence indicate that antibiotic-resistance among human Salmonella infections results from the use of antimicrobial agents in food animals (2). Below is an overview of antibiotic-resistance and Salmonella and what it means for human health.

Antibiotics and drug-resistance

Many bacterial species have the ability to produce antimicrobial compounds. This ability is needed to give the bacteria an “edge” in microorganism-rich environments. Many of the antibiotics used today originated from bacterial species such as Pennicillium, Cephalosporium, and Streptomyces. Antibiotic-resistance likely also emerged as bacteria began producing compounds in order to survive in their environment, and competing species found ways to counteract these compounds (3).

Antimicrobial agents are currently used for three main reasons: (1) to treat infections in humans, animals, and plants; (2) prophylactically in humans, animals, and plants; and (3) subtherapeutically in food animals as growth promoters and for feed conversion (2). When antibiotic use became the norm in both human and animal medicine, selection pressure increased the bacterial advantage of maintaining and developing new resistance genes that could be shared among bacterial populations (3).

The first suggestion that antibiotic use in livestock led to antibiotic-resistant bacteria was in 1951. Starr and Reynolds reported streptomycin resistance in generic intestinal bacteria from turkeys that had been fed that antibiotic (4).

The use of antibiotics not only selects for antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, but may also increase the likelihood of disease transmission. In 2006, Bauer-Garland et al. researched the transmission of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Salmonella Typhimurium in broiler chicks under selective-pressure. An MDR S. Typhimurium strain had significantly increased transmission when chicks were treated with tetracycline, demonstrating that antimicrobial use influences transmission of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens in poultry (5).

Antibiotics and Salmonella

Although most Salmonella infections are self-limited, causing acute gastrointestinal illness in humans, antimicrobial agents are commonly prescribed to those seeking medical attention. Severe infections that spread to the bloodstream, meningeal linings of the brain, or other deep tissue can also occur. The selection of effective antibiotics is critical for the treatment of invasive infections, but has become more difficult as antibiotic-resistance has increased (2).

In the 1980’s and 90’s, a particular strain of MDR Salmonella, known as Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 (DT104), emerged in the U.S. This strain is typically resistant to at least five drugs: ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfisoxazole, and tetracycline (6). Since 1996, the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) has identified increasing numbers of Salmonella isolates resistant to nine of the 17 antimicrobial agents tested: amoxicillin/clavulanate, ampicillin, cefoxitin, ceftiofur, cephalothin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline. These isolates also have decreased susceptibility or resistance to ceftriaxone, an antimicrobial used to treat serious infections in children (7). Salmonella isolates with this resistance pattern carry a gene that produces AmpC-type enzymes that cause much of the drug-resistance; thus they are referred to as MDR-AmpC.

Salmonella Enteritidis is one of the most common types of Salmonella causing human illness, and is associated with consumption of egg-containing products and chicken (8). Since 1996, an increasing number of S. Enteritidis isolates submitted to NARMS have been resistant to nalidixic acid (a drug closely related to ciprofloxacin, or cipro, the most commonly prescribed antibiotic for Salmonella infections). Of these resistant isolates, 90% also showed decreased susceptibility to cipro (7).

Use of antibiotics in agriculture

Antibiotics are used in food animals for several reasons: treatment of sick animals, prophylaxis to prevent illness during times of increased risk of disease (e.g. transport or weaning), a combination of treatment of sick animals and preventative care for other animals in the herd or flock, and for growth promotion and improved feed utilization. The total amount of antibiotics used in food production animals in the U.S. is not known (3).

Antimicrobial agents have played an important role in animal production since the 1950’s. As livestock and poultry farms have grown and animal density on those farms has increased, the demand for better disease management has increased. The use of antimicrobial agents in animal production has improved animal health and led to higher yields. However, this practice has also contributed to the increased prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria significant to human health (3).

The rising prevalence of MDR Salmonella complicates the treatment of Salmonella infections in both humans and animals. A call for prudent use of antibiotics in both human and animal medicine has been issued for years, with some positive results. In 2005, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) placed a ban on the use of enrofloxacin (a drug closely related to cipro) in poultry because of the risk that it promotes drug-resistant bacteria that are harmful to human health (9). Opponents to banning antibiotic use in animal agriculture have pointed out that bans like these have, in some cases, led to increased animal morbidity and mortality, and have sometimes contributed to a greater use of antibiotics to treat ill animals. These other antibiotics may come from drug families of greater relevance to human medicine than the drugs that were banned (3).

New data also suggests that use of cephalosporins in the poultry industry could be impacting clinical use in humans. In July, 2008, the FDA proposed a ban of veterinary use of cephalosporins for unapproved methods (such as injection of eggs in hatcheries) due to the likely emergence of cephalosporin-resistant strains of foodborne bacterial pathogens (10). Since cipro is not approved for treatment of Salmonella infections in children under 18 years of age, cephalosporins are an important treatment option for severe infections (11). The American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA), which represents both public and private sector veterinarians, argued that the FDA’s proposal was unjustified. FDA withdrew the proposal in November, 2008 in order to reconsider all available data on the subject (10).

Antibiotic-Resistant Salmonella in the Food Supply

Antibiotic-resistant Salmonella have been isolated from various food products. In 1998, 20% of ground meat samples were positive for Salmonella, and 84% of these were resistant to at least one antibiotic in the Washington, D.C. area (12). From 1999 to 2003, 18% of Salmonella isolates from various food products tested by the FDA were resistant to two or more antimicrobials (13).

A case-control study of Salmonella Newport infections in the U.S. found that MDR-AmpC infections are acquired through the U.S. food supply from bovine and possible poultry sources (14). Between 2004 and 2005, processed poultry from the mid-Atlantic area of the U.S. was positive for Salmonella in high numbers. Eighty percent of positive samples were resistant to at least one antimicrobial and 53% were resistant to three or more antimicrobials (15). In 2005, Salmonella was detected on 72% of broiler chicken carcasses prior to evisceration and on 20% of carcasses postchill in a sample of 20 U.S. processing plants. Only 15% of the S. Typhimurium var. 5- isolates were pan-susceptible, and more than half of these isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics (16). In 2006, 22% of raw and ready-to-eat turkey meat purchased in a Midwestern U.S. city was positive for Salmonella. Of these isolates, 62% were multidrug-resistant (17). These results clearly show that MDR Salmonella are present in the food supply, and continued monitoring and research is necessary to track these alarming trends.

Human Infections

Several studies have been published focusing on the severe health consequences from multidrug-resistant Salmonella infections. In 2002, Helms et al. reported on a study in Denmark looking at antibiotic-resistant S. Typhimurium. Patients with MDR infections were 4.8 times more likely to die than the general population, and patients with quinolone-resistant infections were 10.3 times more likely to die (18). In 2004, Helms also reported that patients with quinolone-resistant S. Typhimurium infections had a two-fold increased risk of invasive illness or death within 90 days of infection compared to patients with pan-susceptible infections (19).

Also in 2004, Martin et al. reported on Canadians with MDR S. Typhimurium infection. Hospitalization was more likely in those with MDR infections, and the majority of these hospitalizations were directly attributed to the resistance patterns of the infections (20).

In 2005, Varma et al. published data on bloodstream infections and hospitalizations.
Patients infected with a Salmonella isolate resistant to one or more clinically important antibiotic were three times more likely to be hospitalized with a bloodstream infection than patients with pan-susceptible infections (21).

Outbreaks

Several outbreaks of multidrug-resistant Salmonella infections have been documented in the United States, including an outbreak associated with unpasteurized Mexican-style aged cheese (22), ground beef outbreaks (23, 24, 25, 26), and an outbreak associated with pasteurized milk (27).

In one investigation, hamburger was traced back through meat processing to well beef cattle that had been fed antibiotics (23). In another investigation, chloramphenicol-resistant S. Newport was traced through processing of contaminated ground beef to a dairy farm area. Chloramphenicol-resistant Salmonella was found in manure lagoons, abattoirs, ill dairy cattle, and ground beef. Isolation of chloramphenicol-resistant Salmonella was correlated with chloramphenicol use on the farms (24).

Outbreaks like these can result in multiple hospitalizations and death among individuals with the most severe infections. The multidrug-resistant nature of these organisms makes treatment failure more likely. Antimicrobial agents, particularly fluoroquinolones like cipro, are lifesaving for approximately 2,000 people each year in the U.S. If even 10% of Salmonella isolates in the United States were to become resistant to cipro, and 5% of persons with invasive cipro-resistant infections were to die, the result would be an increase of 10 deaths per year. If 50% of strains became resistant, an additional 100 deaths per year would be expected (2).

Conclusions

There are several reasons to conclude that antibiotic-resistance among human Salmonella isolates are the result of the use of antimicrobial agents in food animal production: (1) tracebacks from foodborne disease outbreaks have shown food animals as the ultimate source of infection (outbreak refs), (2) antimicrobial resistance patterns and genetic fingerprints have shown strong correlation between animal and human Salmonella (2, 6), and (3) antibiotic-resistance in human Salmonella isolates have shown more correlation with antibiotic use in animals than with antibiotic use in humans (2).

Dissemination of MDR Salmonella appears to contribute to changes in resistance patterns. In the U.S., there aren’t restrictions on movement of animal herds positive for S. Typhimurium, though the purchase of infected animals is known to be a risk factor for dissemination. Routine surveillance and intervention (including traceback and quarantine) has reduced the incidence of salmonellosis in food animals in Europe, specifically Norway and Sweden. Biosecurity measures, including protection of feed from rodents and birds, limiting human traffic, disinfection, and separation of newly purchased animals from the larger herd or flock, in addition to testing and quarantine would reduce the risk of introducing MDR Salmonella into a herd or flock. Addressing this issue would subsequently help prevent the unimpeded spread of MDR Salmonella through food animals with consequent human foodborne infection (28).

Some of the same farm management strategies that could help to prevent foodborne disease could also help prevent MDR Salmonella from circulating in the food supply. It ultimately comes down to cost vs. benefit at every step in the chain of responsibility among food producers. Farmers and their veterinarians should be responsible for judicious use of antibiotics in the animal industry just as physicians should be judicious in their use of antibiotics in human medicine. Farmers also need to implement biosecurity measures as outlined above to address problem of dissemination of MDR Salmonella in addition to other infectious agents. In an ideal world, slaughter and food manufacturing facilities would also follow suit, using the best possible practices to minimize foodborne disease transmission to consumers, and federal regulatory agencies would monitor each step in the overall process to ensure the best food safety practices possible. If the problem of antibiotic-resistance is not controlled, larger outbreaks with more severe consequences can be expected. Considering MDR Salmonella to be an official “adulterant” in foods would be a prudent step in helping to curb this emerging foodborne disease threat.

References

$12M fund set aside for Peanut Corporation of America salmonella victims' claims

Today U.S. Bankruptcy Judge William E. Anderson ordered Peanut Corporation of America's insurance carrier Hartford to set aside $12 million to reimburse people for health complications that resulted from eating tainted peanut products. Peanut Corporation of America declared bankruptcy in February.

Claims must be submitted to a claims administrator by October 31, said Trustee Roy V. Creasy of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Virginia, Lynchburg Division. PCA's salmonella-tainted peanut butter and peanut paste were linked to 714 illnesses and at least nine deaths, starting last year, federal authorities said. PCA's products were used in the manufacturing of other companies' food products nationwide, including cakes, candies, crackers, cookies and ice cream. Thousands of the products were recalled.

FDA Product Recall List


FDA Salmonella Typhimurium Outbreak 2009. Flash Player 9 is required.FDA Peanut Product Recall Widget. Flash Player 9 is required. Visit http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/peanutbutterrecall/index.cfm to search for peanut product recalls or call CDC-INFO at 1-800-232-4636 for more information.